This is the Rubric the students will be evaluated on for their PowerPoint presentations.
Title of Presentation___________________________________________________
Group Members______________________________________________________
CATEGORIES
Excellent-4 Good-3 Satisfactory-2 Needs Improvement-1
Content - Accuracy
4 All content throughout the presentation is accurate. There are no factual errors.
3 Most of the content is accurate but there is one piece of information that seems inaccurate.
2 The content is generally accurate, but one piece of information is clearly inaccurate.
1 Content confusing or contains more than one factual error.
Sequencing of Information
4 Information is organized in a clear, logical way. It is easy to anticipate the next slide.
3 Most information is organized in a clear, logical way. One slide or piece of information seems out of place.
2 Some information is logically sequenced. An occasional slide or piece of information seems out of place.
1 There is no clear plan for the organization of information.
Effectiveness
4 Project includes all material needed to give a good understanding of the topic. The project is consistent with the driving question.
3 Project is lacking one or two key elements. Project is consistent with driving question most of the time.
2 Project is missing more than two key elements. It is rarely consistent with the driving question.
1 Project is lacking several key elements and has inaccuracies. .Project is completely inconsistent with driving question.
Use of Graphics
4 All graphics are attractive (size and colors) and support the topic of the presentation.
3 A few graphics are not attractive but all support the topic of the presentation.
2 All graphics are attractive but a few do not support the topic of the presentation.
1 Several graphics are unattractive AND detract from the content of the presentation.
Text - Font Choice & Formatting
4 Font formats (color, bold, italic) have been carefully planned to enhance readability and content.
3 Font formats have been carefully planned to enhance readability.
2 Font formatting has been carefully planned to complement the content. It may be a little hard to read.
1 Font formatting makes it very difficult to read the material.
Spelling and Grammar
4 Presentation has no misspellings or grammatical errors.
3 Presentation has 1-2 misspellings, but no grammatical errors.
2 Presentation has 1-2 grammatical errors but no misspellings.
1 Presentation has more than 2 grammatical and/or spelling errors.
Cooperation
4 Group shares tasks and all performed responsibly all of the time.
3 Group shares tasks and performed responsibly most of the time.
2 Group shares tasks and performs responsibly some of the time.
1 Group often is not effective in sharing tasks and/or sharing responsibility.
Delivery
4 Members spoke at a good rate, volume and with good grammar. They maintained eye-contact while using, but not reading their notes.
3 Members spoke a little faster or slower than necessary, or too quietly or loudly. They used acceptable grammar. They maintained eye-contact, but relied too much on their notes.
2 Members spoke at a good rate and volume, but used poor grammar. They relied heavily on their notes.
1 Members demonstrated having paid little attention to rate, volume or grammar. They read nearly word for word from notes.
Title of Presentation___________________________________________________
Group Members______________________________________________________
CATEGORIES
Excellent-4 Good-3 Satisfactory-2 Needs Improvement-1
Content - Accuracy
4 All content throughout the presentation is accurate. There are no factual errors.
3 Most of the content is accurate but there is one piece of information that seems inaccurate.
2 The content is generally accurate, but one piece of information is clearly inaccurate.
1 Content confusing or contains more than one factual error.
Sequencing of Information
4 Information is organized in a clear, logical way. It is easy to anticipate the next slide.
3 Most information is organized in a clear, logical way. One slide or piece of information seems out of place.
2 Some information is logically sequenced. An occasional slide or piece of information seems out of place.
1 There is no clear plan for the organization of information.
Effectiveness
4 Project includes all material needed to give a good understanding of the topic. The project is consistent with the driving question.
3 Project is lacking one or two key elements. Project is consistent with driving question most of the time.
2 Project is missing more than two key elements. It is rarely consistent with the driving question.
1 Project is lacking several key elements and has inaccuracies. .Project is completely inconsistent with driving question.
Use of Graphics
4 All graphics are attractive (size and colors) and support the topic of the presentation.
3 A few graphics are not attractive but all support the topic of the presentation.
2 All graphics are attractive but a few do not support the topic of the presentation.
1 Several graphics are unattractive AND detract from the content of the presentation.
Text - Font Choice & Formatting
4 Font formats (color, bold, italic) have been carefully planned to enhance readability and content.
3 Font formats have been carefully planned to enhance readability.
2 Font formatting has been carefully planned to complement the content. It may be a little hard to read.
1 Font formatting makes it very difficult to read the material.
Spelling and Grammar
4 Presentation has no misspellings or grammatical errors.
3 Presentation has 1-2 misspellings, but no grammatical errors.
2 Presentation has 1-2 grammatical errors but no misspellings.
1 Presentation has more than 2 grammatical and/or spelling errors.
Cooperation
4 Group shares tasks and all performed responsibly all of the time.
3 Group shares tasks and performed responsibly most of the time.
2 Group shares tasks and performs responsibly some of the time.
1 Group often is not effective in sharing tasks and/or sharing responsibility.
Delivery
4 Members spoke at a good rate, volume and with good grammar. They maintained eye-contact while using, but not reading their notes.
3 Members spoke a little faster or slower than necessary, or too quietly or loudly. They used acceptable grammar. They maintained eye-contact, but relied too much on their notes.
2 Members spoke at a good rate and volume, but used poor grammar. They relied heavily on their notes.
1 Members demonstrated having paid little attention to rate, volume or grammar. They read nearly word for word from notes.
